THE criticism often leveled against the Syrian rebellion—that they are not actively fighting Israel and are advocating for peace with neighbouring countries—requires a nuanced response grounded in both political strategy and Islamic teachings. Such a perspective demonstrates that these approaches are not contradictions but align with Islamic wisdom and rational political decision-making.
From a political standpoint, the Syrian rebels’ approach reflects an understanding of priorities and strategic planning. In a region marred by decades of conflict, their immediate focus is to stabilise Syria. The rebellion seeks to rebuild government institutions, improve security, restore the economy, and address the plight of displaced Syrians. By concentrating on these urgent issues, the rebels are sending a clear message: their current mission is internal reconstruction and national recovery.
Declaring an open agenda against Israel prematurely would be a grave strategic mistake. History provides ample lessons on the consequences of exposing one’s plans to adversaries without adequate preparation.
Take, for instance, the contrasting approaches of Egyptian leaders Gamal Abdel Nasser and Anwar Sadat. Nasser spent years engaging in fiery rhetoric against Israel and the West, making bold threats that lacked substantive preparation. When war broke out, Egypt suffered devastating defeats, as his words were not backed by actionable strategies.
In contrast, Sadat adopted a more calculated approach. While publicly pushing for peace and focusing on Egypt’s economic and social development, he was quietly preparing for the October 1973 War. His strategy not only reclaimed Egypt’s occupied territories but also forced Israel to negotiate seriously with Egypt.
The rebels’ approach mirrors such strategic prudence. Publicly announcing hostility toward Israel while Syria remains fragile would only exacerbate the challenges they face. Instead, the rebels must focus on creating a stable foundation before contemplating external confrontations.
The strategies of Yahya Sinwar offered another instructive example. Sinwar maintained a posture of seeking long-term peace and economic development for Gaza, a stance that lulled Israeli leadership into a false sense of security. This perception, carefully cultivated since his time in prison, played a role in his eventual release, as Israel underestimated his long-term intentions.
The events of October 7th demonstrated how Sinwar used this strategic patience to catch Israel off guard. By focusing on internal development and downplaying his military ambitions, he was able to strengthen Gaza’s position before launching an unexpected and highly impactful attack.
For the Syrian rebels, adopting a similar approach is not only rational but necessary. Declaring open war against Israel or Western powers would be premature and counterproductive. Instead, they must prioritise internal stability, focus on rebuilding Syria, and address pressing socio-economic issues. This strategic patience is not cowardice—it is wisdom rooted in the lessons of history.
Criticism of the Syrian rebels also stems from contradictions and biases among their detractors. Some accuse them of being radical extremists aligned with terrorist ideologies, while others claim they are agents of the United States or Israel. These contradictory accusations reflect a lack of sincerity and a desire to undermine their credibility.
Islam calls on us to seek the truth and avoid making baseless accusations. Allah says in Surah Al-Hujurat:
“O you who have believed, if there comes to you a disobedient one with information, investigate, lest you harm a people out of ignorance and become, over what you have done, regretful.” (Quran 49:6)
As Muslims, we are commanded to verify information and avoid slander. Judging the rebels’ intentions without clear evidence contradicts this divine command.
Islam also emphasises having good intentions toward fellow Muslims. The rebels’ focus on internal stability and peace with neighbouring countries should not be viewed as a betrayal of Islamic principles but as a pragmatic strategy that aligns with the Quranic principle of prioritising the greater good.
The example of Iran is also relevant here. While Iran has often presented itself as a staunch opponent of Israel, its direct confrontations are limited, preferring to act through proxies. This approach underscores the importance of patience and indirect strategies in addressing complex geopolitical realities.
The Syrian rebels’ decision to prioritise Syria’s internal recovery and avoid open confrontation with Israel is both a rational political strategy and a reflection of Islamic wisdom. Their focus on stabilising the country, rebuilding institutions, and addressing immediate challenges demonstrates a commitment to their people and a long-term vision for Syria’s future.
Premature declarations of hostility would serve no purpose other than to weaken their position and provide their enemies with ammunition to further destabilise the region. History, from Sadat to Sinwar, teaches us the value of strategic patience and the importance of prioritising one’s goals.
Critics of the rebels must reflect on their own biases and contradictions. As Muslims, we must seek truth, avoid slander, and support efforts that align with both political wisdom and Islamic principles. The path forward for the Syrian rebellion lies in unity, strategic planning, and a steadfast commitment to rebuilding their homeland before addressing external conflicts. – January 1, 2025
Abbod Al-Khwlidi reads Scoop