Is Mavcom advocating for refunds without compensation? – YS Chan

Money returned for undelivered services or goods is a given, so passengers should also be entitled to compensation for expenses incurred due to cancelled or delayed flights

1:57 PM MYT

 

IT is a given that businesses should return the money paid for services or goods not delivered to customers. Otherwise, disgruntled buyers could file a suit in court or seek redress at the Consumer Claims Tribunal if the amount is no more than RM50,000. 

Regulated industries must also comply with additional rules imposed by the overseeing government agency – such as airlines which fall under the purview of the Malaysian Aviation Commission (Mavcom), established in 2016. 

On January 1, 2017, passenger service charge (PSC) was raised and Mavcom executive chairman Tan Sri Abdullah Ahmad said: “Our work on the PSC review aims to safeguard consumer interests, promote fair competition and ensure airport operators continue to enhance their service levels. 

“At the same time, the Commission will continue to strive for consumer protection through the Malaysian Aviation Consumer Protection Code.” 

These words turned out to be more like hot air the following year when passengers did not receive refunds for cancelled flights in 2020 – a period too painful to revisit and discuss here. 

Recently on September 2, Malaysia Airlines flight MH66 heading for Seoul, South Korea was forced to return after a delayed takeoff from Kuala Lumpur International Airport. 

Subsequently, there were many reports by the local media with headings such as “Airlines must refund consumers within 30 days, says Mavcom”, “Passengers of Seoul-bound Malaysia Airlines flight entitled to refund, says Mavcom”, “Mavcom: Malaysia Airlines passengers can claim refunds after Seoul flights turns back to KLIA after departure”, “Mavcom: Airlines must refund passengers via the original mode of payment within 30 days”, and “Passengers of cancelled MAS flight entitled to a refund, says Mavcom”. 

I find all the above headings disturbing as refunds are given by virtually all businesses and are not enough of a big deal to warrant reporting. 

The reports would have more substance if passengers were entitled to compensation for expenses incurred such as cancellation charges imposed by hotels. 

Additionally, a token sum could be paid for inconveniences as it would be difficult to estimate the cost of lost opportunities, which can be huge for those travelling on business. But to merely inform passengers that they could claim refunds for flight cancellation was more like lip service. 

Instead, airlines should be made to refund automatically without requiring passengers to file a claim. If not given within 30 days, there must be extenuating circumstances for failure to do so. 

How long must air passengers wait to get the level of protection professed by Mavcom? – September 5, 2024

YS Chan reads Scoop

Topics

 

Popular

RM13 bil Penang Mutiara Line LRT to boost connectivity, set for 2031 completion

The 29.5-kilometre line with 21 stations aims to enhance travel across Penang and drive economic growth

DBKL slices up Havoc Food Festival in Setapak as traffic complaints boil over

Nik Nazmi steps in after residents complain of congestion, authorities shut down unlicensed event

In latest book ‘Saving the Planet’, Nik Nazmi makes urgent call for climate action

New book offers a Malaysian perspective on the global environmental crisis, highlighting economic and social stakes of climate change

Related