BRICS: a strategic integration – Yusmadi Yusoff

Membership of powerful grouping will facilitate Malaysia’s economic and global aspirations

12:56 PM MYT

 

AS Malaysia navigates the complexities of a rapidly evolving global landscape, the consideration of joining BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) under Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s leadership is both timely and strategic. This move reflects a well-calibrated vision for our nation’s economic growth, geopolitical influence, and global engagement, aligning with Malaysia’s broader aspirations for a dynamic and resilient future.

Economic diversification and growth

Malaysia’s potential integration into BRICS offers significant economic advantages. The BRICS nations represent some of the largest and fastest-growing economies globally, providing Malaysia with unparalleled opportunities to expand trade relations and attract investment. In an era where global economic uncertainties are frequent, diversifying our economic partnerships beyond traditional markets like the United States and the European Union is crucial for sustained growth and resilience.

BRICS membership could unlock new avenues for Malaysia to access vast consumer markets and varied economic sectors within these countries. Such engagement would invigorate our economy, fostering robust trade links and investment flows that are essential for a resilient economic structure. This aligns seamlessly with our vision of a diversified economy capable of adapting to and thriving amidst global economic shifts.

Enhancing geopolitical stature

Beyond the economic realm, joining BRICS represents a strategic shift in Malaysia’s geopolitical positioning. Historically, Malaysia has adeptly balanced its foreign policy, fostering relationships with both Western and Eastern powers. Integration into BRICS would further solidify this balanced approach, embedding Malaysia deeper into the emerging multipolar world order where influence is more evenly distributed.

As a member of BRICS, Malaysia would enhance its role as a regional leader within Asean, advocating effectively for the collective interests of Southeast Asian nations on a global stage. This move positions Malaysia as a pivotal interlocutor, capable of bridging the diverse perspectives of BRICS and Asean, thus fostering greater regional cohesion and cooperation. This is particularly important as global power dynamics shift and new economic alliances form.

Developmental benefits and technological exchange

The developmental potential of BRICS membership is a compelling reason for Malaysia’s interest. Access to the BRICS’ New Development Bank can provide crucial funding for infrastructure projects that drive economic growth and modernization. This financial support is pivotal in achieving Malaysia’s ambitious development goals, facilitating advancements across various sectors.

Moreover, BRICS is a hub for technological innovation and exchange. Collaboration with leading economies within BRICS can propel Malaysia forward in technological advancements, enhancing our capacity for innovation and modernisation. This partnership is essential for realising our vision of a technologically adept and forward-looking nation, ready to meet the challenges of the 21st century.

Contributing to a multipolar world order

Malaysia’s interest in BRICS also reflects a broader trend towards a multipolar world where emerging economies play a critical role in global governance. Aligning with BRICS allows Malaysia to diversify its economic and diplomatic engagements, contributing to a more equitable and inclusive international system. This alignment resonates with Malaysia’s longstanding commitment to promoting justice, fairness, and balanced development globally.

Strengthening diplomatic influence

Membership in BRICS would amplify Malaysia’s diplomatic influence, providing a stronger platform for international economic and political dialogue. This enhanced leverage is crucial for Malaysia to assert its interests effectively, influence global standards and practices, and advocate for policies that resonate with the aspirations of developing nations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Malaysia’s consideration to join BRICS under Anwar’s leadership is a strategic decision that embodies a vision for a dynamic, resilient, and forward-thinking future. It represents a comprehensive approach to economic diversification, geopolitical influence, and developmental progress, aligning Malaysia with a coalition of nations that reflect the aspirations of emerging economies in the 21st century.

As chairman and founder of the RIGHTS Foundation, an independent think tank dedicated to governance, human rights, and social justice, and as a member of the Consultative Council on Foreign Policy at the Foreign Affairs Ministry, I firmly believe that Malaysia’s potential integration into BRICS will reinforce our nation’s role as a proactive and influential player on the world stage. This strategic move underscores our commitment to fostering shared prosperity and balanced diplomacy, charting a course for Malaysia’s continued growth and global engagement.

By embracing BRICS, Malaysia is not just seeking membership in a prominent group but is making a calculated step towards a future where we play a significant role in shaping a more balanced and inclusive global order. – June 19, 2024

Yusmadi Yusoff is chairman and founder of RIGHTS Foundation, member of the Consultative Council on Foreign Policy, Foreign Affairs Ministry, former senator and MP of Malaysia

Topics

Popular

China’s rising 17-year-old badminton star, Zhang Zhijie, dead after collapsing on court

He was participating in the ongoing Asian Junior Badminton Championships in Indonesia

Local label Rizman Ruzaini to design Malaysia’s kit for Olympics opening ceremony?

Fashion house has dressed many high-profile figures, including squash icon Datuk Nicol David and top model Naomi Campbell

Poor driver vetting will steer public away from inDrive, says assault victim’s lawyer

Victim has criticised the company’s lack of transparency and slow response, is prepared to take legal action

Related