[UPDATED] Court strikes out Halim Saad’s suit against govt, Dr Mahathir, ex-finance minister II

Judge reaches decision on grounds of statute of limitation

12:41 PM MYT

 

KUALA LUMPUR – The high court has dismissed the suit brought about by businessman Tan Sri Halim Saad against the government, former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad and former finance minister II Tan Sri Nor Mohamed Yakcop.

High court judicial commissioner Suzana Muhamad Said allowed the defendants’ bid to strike out Halim’s suit on the grounds of statute of limitation.

In the statement of defence filed last year, the Malaysian government denied having forcibly taken over the shareholding of United Engineers Malaysia Bhd (UEM) and Renong Bhd, owned by the latter’s former executive chairman Halim 23 years ago.

The trio said the takeover was approved by Halim, who received RM165 million in compensation.

“This court finds that the 2013 case is actually disposed of. Therefore, whatever the issue was, the principle of res judicata and the statute of limitation are thus applicable.

“There is a reason why there is a limitation. It is to put a stop to unnecessary action being taken, especially after a period of time,” the judge was quoted as saying by Bernama in her broad grounds.

On April 17, 2013, Halim filed a similar suit against Khazanah Nasional, Nor Mohamed and the government to claim damages of more than RM1.8 billion for selling his shares in Renong. 

However, on October 31, 2013, the high court allowed a striking-out application by Khazanah Nasional, Nor Mohamed and the government on the grounds that Halim had filed the suit after a six-year time frame.

As required under the Limitation Act 1953, the suit should be filed within six years. Eventually, he also failed in his appeal at the Federal Court in 2015.

According to Suzana, the acquisition was in 2001, which has been more than 20 years.

She ordered Halim to pay costs of RM10,000. 

Senior federal counsel Ahmad Hanir Hambaly appeared for Dr Mahathir, Nor Mohamed and the government, while Halim was represented by counsels Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar and Surendra Ananth. 

Based on the statement of claim filed with the suit on August 2 last year, Halim, who is the former executive chairman and director of Renong, claimed that he intended to make a general offer to privatise UEM as a subsidiary of Renong, with the implementation enabling the plaintiff to gain full control and ownership of UEM. 

He claimed that he was instructed by Dr Mahathir and Nor Mohamed not to proceed with the general offer because the government wanted to take over all the shares in UEM through a designated entity, namely Khazanah Nasional Bhd (Khazanah) or a party to be nominated by Khazanah.

Halim said he was also instructed to leave UEM and Renong as a shareholder and director, including the subsidiaries of the two companies, thus obliging him to hand over control of Renong and UEM to the government and further dispose of his Renong shares at a loss.

He claimed that Khazanah had acquired all of UEM’s shares through its subsidiary, Danasaham Sdn Bhd, thereby gaining control over UEM, which at the time owned 32.6% of Renong shares.

Therefore, he is claiming, among other things, compensation for the forced takeover by the government between July and October 2001 and a declaration that he is a Renong shareholder.

Meanwhile, the defendants, in their defence statement, denied having forcibly taken over the shareholding of the two companies, as the takeover was approved by Halim, who received RM165 million in compensation. – May 14, 2024 

Topics

 

Popular

Influencer who recited Quran at Batu Caves accused of sexual misconduct in Netherlands

Abdellatif Ouisa has targeted recently converted, underage Muslim women, alleges Dutch publication

Petronas staff to be shown the door to make up losses from Petros deal?

Source claims national O&G firm is expected to see 30% revenue loss once agreed formula for natural gas distribution in Sarawak is implemented

‘Very hurtful’: Chief justice exposes legal failures driven by distorted Islamic views

Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat laments misinterpretations of faith that distort justice in high-profile rulings, cites Indira Gandhi and Nik Elin Zurina cases

Related