Court allows Rosli Dahlan to challenge police, govt on frozen accounts, travel ban

Lawyer gets leave for judicial review against authorities for wrongful arrest, perverse money laundering probe leading to above actions

2:21 PM MYT

 

KUALA LUMPUR – The high court today granted leave for a judicial review to lawyer Rosli Dahlan against police and eight others, including the government, for freezing his bank accounts, purporting wrongful arrest, and imposing a travel ban against him. 

Judge Datuk Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid said Rosli’s application for judicial review is justified to challenge the police action for unlawfully arresting him and subjecting him to a perverse money laundering investigation. 

He then said that this was used as a basis to freeze his bank accounts and impose a travel ban on him. 

“This court finds that the conduct of the third to fifth respondents to ‘freeze or ban first, investigate later’, prima facie, demonstrates numerous procedural misconducts and subjects the applicant to mala fide actions. 

“The application has passed the threshold for a judicial review, hence leave (permission) is granted for the case to enter the substantive stage.  

The judge also fixed May 8 for case management of the matter before the registrar in a decision delivered via Zoom. 

Quoting Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, Kamal said: “Criminal investigation bodies – whenever they investigate anyone – are bound to comply with the law.

“…any abuse of those powers, such as using them for collateral purposes, not only constitutes possible offences such as abuse of power or obstruction of justice, but also constitutes actionable complaints through the courts’ statutory review powers”. 

Following the decision, Rosli told the court that police had partially lifted the freezing of his accounts and that he filed a second judicial review to seek a release. 

He also had to file a second one after police withdrew the freezing orders but placed a seizure order on his ASNB account to skirt the first judicial review. 

Kamal also said that Rosli may ask for the second judicial review to be transferred to the same court. 

Rosli filed the judicial review application in December, seeking, among other matters, an order for certiorari (a judicial review) against the police and the government to unfreeze his accounts and lift the travel ban against him, resulting from police linking him with a complaint lodged by AirAsia over i-Serve – which the lawyer said had no relation to him. 

On December 29, Rosli filed an affidavit suggesting that this association resulted in his arrest, money laundering investigation, freezing of bank accounts, and imposition of a travel ban.  

Rosli filed the review through Messrs Vin Law Co, naming key figures such as Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Razarudin Husain and commercial crime chief commissioner Datuk Ramli Mohamed Yoosuf among the respondents. – April 3, 2024 

Topics

 

Popular

Petronas staff to be shown the door to make up losses from Petros deal?

Source claims national O&G firm is expected to see 30% revenue loss once agreed formula for natural gas distribution in Sarawak is implemented

FashionValet a loss-making entity before and after Khazanah, PNB’s RM47 mil investment

GLICs bought stakes in 2018, company records show total RM103.3 million losses after tax from 2017 to 2022

‘Very hurtful’: Chief justice exposes legal failures driven by distorted Islamic views

Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat laments misinterpretations of faith that distort justice in high-profile rulings, cites Indira Gandhi and Nik Elin Zurina cases

Related