Defamation dispute: court pushes for amicable settlement between Dzulkefly, Asyraf Wajdi

The trial, originally scheduled for today, postponed due to minister's health, prompting court to consider alternative options for resolving issue

10:49 PM MYT

 

KUALA LUMPUR – The sessions court today proposed an amicable resolution to the suit between Datuk Seri Dzulkefly Ahmad and Datuk Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki regarding a Twitter post allegedly defaming the health minister.

Lawyer Mohamed Shahrul Fazli Kamarulzaman, representing Asyraf, who is Umno secretary-general, said that judge Norakhmar Mohd Sani proposed an amicable resolution during the proceedings in chambers today, in the presence of counsel Jaden Phoon Wai Ken, representing Dzulkefly.

“The judge said the parties can reach a settlement before the trial scheduled for January 20 to 24, 2025,” he told reporters here.

Shahrul said the trial was supposed to be today, but it was postponed because Dzulkefly was not feeling well.

On April 12, 2022, Dzulkefly filed a suit against Asyraf for allegedly posting defamatory content on his Twitter account on August 24, 2020, which was also shared on the defendant’s Facebook account.

In the statement of claim, the plaintiff alleged that the post suggests he engages in cronyism and nepotism, specifically referring to the appointment of his daughter as an Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia (AIM) board member, implying misuse of power and position as health minister for personal and family benefits.

Dzulkefly asserted that the defamatory statements are baseless because, when his daughter was appointed, AIM was overseen by a board of trustees appointed by the government, which at the time was the Barisan Nasional administration. 

Furthermore, he highlighted that he was not a minister, and the Pakatan Harapan political party was not in control at that time.

“In making the appointment, my daughter’s merit and qualifications were objectively evaluated. In addition, the Health Ministry issued a media statement confirming its non-involvement in my daughter’s appointment,” Dzulkefly said in his statement of claim.

As such, he is seeking compensation for general damages, aggravated damages and exemplary damages as well as an injunction to prevent the defendant from reposting or spreading the defamatory content and a written apology to be published either on the defendant’s Twitter account or in a local newspaper of the plaintiff’s choice.

Meanwhile, Asyraf, in his defence statement, said that the post was not made with any malicious intent to harm the plaintiff’s reputation or integrity. – March 14, 2024

Topics

 

Popular

IS launched ‘official’ Malay media group with IED drone manual, firm warns

An international security think tank has warned of the Islamic State terrorist group's latest tactic to expand its influence in Malaysia.  

Influencer who recited Quran at Batu Caves accused of sexual misconduct in Netherlands

Abdellatif Ouisa has targeted recently converted, underage Muslim women, alleges Dutch publication

Petronas staff to be shown the door to make up losses from Petros deal?

Source claims national O&G firm is expected to see 30% revenue loss once agreed formula for natural gas distribution in Sarawak is implemented

Related