AGC given two-week extension to update on settlement of judges’ pensions suit

Suit filed over govt’s alleged failure to fix appropriate hike in pensions, benefits for 35 plaintiffs

5:21 PM MYT

 

KUALA LUMPUR – The high court has given a two-week extension to the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) to update the court on the settlement over a suit on pensions filed by a group of 35 individuals, comprising former members of the judiciary and seven widows of former judges.

The suit was filed over the alleged failure of the government to fix an appropriate increase in the pension and benefits received by the 35 plaintiffs since 2015.

Lawyer Christopher Leong, acting for the 35 plaintiffs, said that the AGC had requested the court for the two-week extension to update on the matter and it was allowed by judge Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh during case management today.

“The court then fixed March 19 for case management for parties to update on the settlement,” he said.

On January 31, the same court had given one month for the parties to settle the suit. Previously, the same court, on October 6, 2022, had given two months for the government to look into the possibility of the proposed settlement of the suit. 

In the suit, filed on January 24, 2022, the plaintiffs named the government, the prime minister, the cabinet and the public service director-general as the first to the fourth defendants.

The plaintiffs are seeking a declaration that failure to fix through a government gazette an appropriate increment of more than 2% in their pension and other benefits according to Section 15B(2) of the Judges’ Remuneration Act 1971 had violated Articles 125(7) and 125(9) of the Federal Constitution.

The plaintiffs are also seeking an order that the second or third defendant (the prime minister and the cabinet respectively) shall advise the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to fix a higher increment of more than 2% annually on the pension and other benefits given to them, effective July 1, 2015, according to Section 15B(2) of the Judges’ Remuneration Act.

The plaintiffs also said that under Section 15B of the Judges’ Remuneration Act, the pensions of retired judges and dependents of deceased judges were adjusted automatically based on the current salaries of the serving judges, which were reviewed in stages from time to time, as required under Articles 125(7) and 125(9) of the Federal Constitution. – March 5, 2024

Topics

 

Popular

Petronas staff to be shown the door to make up losses from Petros deal?

Source claims national O&G firm is expected to see 30% revenue loss once agreed formula for natural gas distribution in Sarawak is implemented

‘Very hurtful’: Chief justice exposes legal failures driven by distorted Islamic views

Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat laments misinterpretations of faith that distort justice in high-profile rulings, cites Indira Gandhi and Nik Elin Zurina cases

The ‘powerful’ fallacy of MCMC – Wong Chun Wai

New regulations are needed to police rampant crimes committed on social media platforms used by millions of Malaysians

Related