Court upholds decision: Bukit Cherakah degazettement challenge denied

Judge says application for review 'out of time', as decision to degazette was made on Nov 20, 2000

11:50 AM MYT

 

KUALA LUMPUR – The Court of Appeal has upheld the high court decision to deny leave for a judicial review to challenge the Selangor government’s degazettement of Bukit Cherakah as a forest reserve.

In delivering the court’s decision, judge Datuk Azizah Nawawi said the application to review the degazettement decision made in 2000 “is clearly out of time and this goes to the issue of jurisdiction”.

The Selangor exco decision to degazette was made on November 20, 2000.

She said the review application should be filed promptly and within three months from the date when the grounds of the application first arose or when the decision was first told to the appellants.

“Even if the appellants have no knowledge of the impugn decision made in year 2000, the grounds of the application would have arisen when parts of the said lands were alienated to the other parties between 2001 and 2016, respectively. 

“Thereafter, the said parties have developed the said land into housing estates, including Taman Budiman and the Universiti Teknologi Mara, UiTM (Kampus Puncak Perdana).”

The two other judges were Datuk Azimah Omar and Datuk Wong Kian Kheong.

The appeal against the high court decision on November 17 was filed on May 5 by Shah Alam Community Forest Society and Pertubuhan Pelindung Khazanah Alam Malaysia, the assistant state legal adviser Khairul Nizam Abu Bakar appearing for the Selangor government, the state executive council, the state Forestry Department director, and the Petaling Land and Mines Department, as well as the counsels for two companies and the state Development Corporation (PKNS).

The two NGOs claimed that it was illegal for the Selangor government to backdate a gazette, notifying that a decision had been made on the degazettement on November 20, 2000.

They had named the Selangor government, the state executive council, the state Forestry Department director, the Petaling Land and Mines Department, YCH Development Sdn Bhd, PKNS, and Restu Mantap Sdn Bhd as respondents in the judicial review. – January 24, 2024

Topics

 

Popular

‘Very hurtful’: Chief justice exposes legal failures driven by distorted Islamic views

Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat laments misinterpretations of faith that distort justice in high-profile rulings, cites Indira Gandhi and Nik Elin Zurina cases

Elderly, disabled face ‘roadblocks’ as public transport goes fully digital

Consumer group urges government and public transport companies to be more inclusive with digitalisation approach

Cops to call up 13 varsity students who joined Jan 25 anti-graft rally

Himpunan Advokasi Rakyat Malaysia rep says this includes three from Sabah who would have to fly to KL; summoned rallygoers may meet police together on Sunday to receive notice

Related