Law firm seeks 1MDB’s consent to disclose docs linked to Goldman settlement

Rosli Dahlan Saravana Partnership has been compelled by MACC to produce said documents

3:33 PM MYT

 

KUALA LUMPUR – Law firm Rosli Dahlan Saravana Partnership has written to 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) seeking the company’s consent to provide graft busters with some of the documents sought in relation to the settlement agreement concerning Goldman Sachs and AmBank, the high court was told today.

The law firm’s partner, Palpanaban Devarajoo, said this in an affidavit-in-reply filed yesterday in response to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission’s (MACC) application before the high court to compel the firm to produce documents regarding the said settlements.

“The firm has written to our former client, 1MDB, on October 16 seeking its consent and authority to disclose privileged and confidential material insofar as the same is relevant to the present application,” said the lawyer, adding that the firm was served with copies of the MACC legal action at about 2.50pm last October 13.

“The firm shall be filing its substantive response to the application in due course after the counsel (retained by the law firm for the present matter) has the opportunity to advise us. Thus, the firm reserves our rights,” he said.

He read out this part of the affidavit during the case management before high court judge K. Muniandy, who then set November 9 for mention. 

Yesterday, the MACC requested documents from two lawyers suspected of accepting bribes and receiving proceeds from unlawful activities in the settlement between the Malaysian government with Ambank and Goldman Sachs regarding the 1MDB issue.

The request was made in two applications filed at the high court last October 11.

The MACC named Chetan Jethwani and his law firm, Chetan Jethwani & Co, as the respondents in one of the applications, while Rosli Dahlan and Rosli Dahlan Saravana Partnership were named the respondents in the other application.

Chetan is the lawyer for Bersatu president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin in a civil case, while Rosli represented the former prime minister in a case related to the Jana Wibawa project.

The MACC requested for the respondents to submit 10 documents, including their letters of appointment as lawyers for Goldman Sachs (Chetan) and 1MDB (Rosli), their bank account statements and the bank account statements of their companies.

The MACC contended that the documents are needed to identify the role and actions of the two lawyers, who are suspected of conspiring with Goldman Sachs and the parties concerned in implementing a scheme that reduces the amount of the asset recovery in the settlement on the amount to be paid to the Malaysian government. – October 17, 2023

Topics

 

Popular

Petronas staff to be shown the door to make up losses from Petros deal?

Source claims national O&G firm is expected to see 30% revenue loss once agreed formula for natural gas distribution in Sarawak is implemented

‘Very hurtful’: Chief justice exposes legal failures driven by distorted Islamic views

Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat laments misinterpretations of faith that distort justice in high-profile rulings, cites Indira Gandhi and Nik Elin Zurina cases

The ‘powerful’ fallacy of MCMC – Wong Chun Wai

New regulations are needed to police rampant crimes committed on social media platforms used by millions of Malaysians

Related