‘No provision under Income Tax Act preventing Rosmah’s prosecution’

DPP says ex-PM’s wife’s claims that court took over SCIT’s functions is baseless

7:02 PM MYT

 

KUALA LUMPUR – The high court was today told that there was no provision in the Income Tax Act 1967 that prevented Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor from being prosecuted on charges of money laundering and failing to declare her income to the Inland Revenue Board (IRB). 

Deputy public prosecutor Poh Yih Tinn said the claim by Rosmah that the court had taken over the functions of the Special Commissioners of Income Tax (SCIT) was baseless. 

This is because the court will judge all the charges made against her according to the criminal jurisdiction provided in the law, he added. 

He said in an affidavit-in-reply, which was filed today in response to Rosmah’s application to strike out the 12 money laundering charges involving RM7,097,750, and five counts of failing to declare her income to the IRB facing her. 

“There is no provision under the framework of the Income Tax Act 1967 that prevents or prohibits the prosecution of non-compliance under Section 77(1) of the same law unless and until the applicant’s (Rosmah) dispute regarding the issue of taxable income is decided by SCIT,” he added.  

Poh also denied claims by Rosmah that the 17 charges made against her were baseless, defective, premature, inconclusive and did not disclose any offence in law. 

“The reasons given by the applicant do not reflect the correct legal position. The issue of whether the description of the subject of the 13th to 17th charge amounts to the type of income that can be taxed (chargeable income) is a question that is decided according to Section 4 of the same law and does not depend on the existence of any order, instruction, request nor assessment by the IRB,” he said. 

Rosmah, 71, who is the wife of former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, filed the notice of motion to be acquitted and discharged of all the 17 charges against her on October 4, 2020. 

She allegedly committed the offences at Affin Bank Bhd, Bangunan Getah Asli Branch, Jalan Ampang in Kuala Lumpur between December 4, 2013 and June 8 2017 and at Inland Revenue Board, Kompleks Bangunan Kerajaan, Jalan Tuanku Abdul Halim in Kuala Lumpur from May 1 2014 until May 1, 2018. 

The trial of the case started last August 24 and two witnesses had testified. – September 21, 2023

Topics

 

Popular

Influencer who recited Quran at Batu Caves accused of sexual misconduct in Netherlands

Abdellatif Ouisa has targeted recently converted, underage Muslim women, alleges Dutch publication

Petronas staff to be shown the door to make up losses from Petros deal?

Source claims national O&G firm is expected to see 30% revenue loss once agreed formula for natural gas distribution in Sarawak is implemented

‘Very hurtful’: Chief justice exposes legal failures driven by distorted Islamic views

Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat laments misinterpretations of faith that distort justice in high-profile rulings, cites Indira Gandhi and Nik Elin Zurina cases

Related