Court dismisses Santhara’s suit over visit to New Zealand during Covid-19

Judge Zulqarnain Hassan made the decision after finding that the defendant’s statement was a reasonable comment

9:06 PM MYT

 

KUALA LUMPUR – The Sessions Court here today dismissed the suit brought by Datuk Seri Edmund Santhara Kumar against Batu MP P. Prabakaran for allegedly defaming the former deputy federal territories minister’s visit to New Zealand during the Covid-19 pandemic, three years ago.

Judge Zulqarnain Hassan made the decision after finding that the defendant’s statement (Prabakaran) was a reasonable comment, as the latter, as a representative of the people, had a responsibility to voice out public issues.

Zulqarnain in his judgment said the defendant disputed the plaintiff’s (Santhara) vacation for 55 days in New Zealand, as it took place at a time when the Movement Control Order (MCO) was being enforced due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

“In the opinion of the court, the issue of there being movement restrictions and a deputy minister being able to go on holiday is a public one. 

“The defendant disputed the plaintiff’s actions not because the plaintiff was Datuk Seri Santhara Kumar, but because the plaintiff was a deputy minister at the time.

“What’s more, at the time, Parliament was also suspended because there was an emergency. 

“Due to that, the court finds the plaintiff’s defamation claim untenable and therefore dismisses the plaintiff’s suit with costs of RM18,000,” he said when delivering the judgment during an online proceeding today.

Santhara filed the suit on June 23, 2021, against Prabakaran for allegedly making defamatory remarks regarding the former’s visit to New Zealand in 2020.

In his statement of claim, Santhara said that the defendant held a press conference outside the New Zealand High Commission on March 17, 2021, between 9.30 am and 2 pm, and issued untrue and false information about the plaintiff’s responsibilities as a deputy minister.

The plaintiff claimed that the defendant or his representative had sent a memorandum to the High Commissioner of New Zealand criticising the approval and permission granted to the plaintiff to visit New Zealand and the defendant had also contacted embassy officials to obtain information about the plaintiff’s application to enter the country.

Prabakaran through a statement of defence filed on September 8, 2021, claimed there was no malicious intent to tarnish the plaintiff’s image or reputation through the statement issued.

At today’s proceedings, Santhara was represented by lawyer N. Krishnan Nair while Prabakaran was represented by lawyer Dinesh Muthal.

Meanwhile, Prabakaran in a media statement expressed his gratitude over the suit’s dismissal.

“I would like to thank the defence lawyers as well as witnesses, especially Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, Senator Isaiah D. Jacob, and other individuals involved either directly or indirectly in this case,” he said. – August 4, 2023

Topics

 

Popular

Petronas staff to be shown the door to make up losses from Petros deal?

Source claims national O&G firm is expected to see 30% revenue loss once agreed formula for natural gas distribution in Sarawak is implemented

Influencer who recited Quran at Batu Caves accused of sexual misconduct in Netherlands

Abdellatif Ouisa has targeted recently converted, underage Muslim women, alleges Dutch publication

Duck and cover? FashionValet bought Vivy’s 30 Maple for RM95 mil in 2018

Purchase of Duck's holding company which appears to be owned wholly by Datin Vivy Yusof and husband Datuk Fadzarudin Shah Anuar was made same year GLICs invested RM47 mil

Related