ByteDance vs US govt: TikTok parent company files suit over divestment law

Suit puts burden on Washington to prove that new law does not trample on free speech

2:44 PM MYT

 

KUALA LUMPUR – TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, is ready for a showdown over free speech with the United States government as the China firm has filed a suit to block the law compelling it to either divest or be banned.

In the suit, ByteDance criticised the US law, calling it an “extraordinary and unconstitutional assertion of power”.

Aside from again denying sharing US user data, ByteDance claimed the law unfairly singles out TikTok as well as circumventing free speech protections.

It added that the government’s “speculative concerns fall far short of what is required when First Amendment rights are at stake”. 

“The law’s national security premise was undermined by the continued use of TikTok by President Biden and members of Congress.”

The suit will put the burden on Washington to prove that the new law does not trample on free speech, among other things.

Critics have pointed out that other social media platforms, such as Facebook, similarly collect user data but have not been accused by the government of posing a threat to national security.

Last November, a federal judge blocked Montana’s efforts to ban TikTok from the state.

Montana, backed by Virginia and 18 states, is appealing the decision. – May 8, 2024

Topics

 

Popular

Duck and cover? FashionValet bought Vivy’s 30 Maple for RM95 mil in 2018

Purchase of Duck's holding company which appears to be owned wholly by Datin Vivy Yusof and husband Datuk Fadzarudin Shah Anuar was made same year GLICs invested RM47 mil

Influencer who recited Quran at Batu Caves accused of sexual misconduct in Netherlands

Abdellatif Ouisa has targeted recently converted, underage Muslim women, alleges Dutch publication

‘Very hurtful’: Chief justice exposes legal failures driven by distorted Islamic views

Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat laments misinterpretations of faith that distort justice in high-profile rulings, cites Indira Gandhi and Nik Elin Zurina cases

Related