What are the nullified and maintained provisions in Nik Elin v Kelantan case?

Apex court rules to strike out 16 sections and decided state assembly only had power over two, but what do these sections entail?

1:17 PM MYT

 

KUALA LUMPUR – The Federal Court today struck out 16 provisions in the Kelantan Shariah Criminal Code (I) Enactment 2019 in favour of Kelantan lawyer Nik Elin Zurina Nik Abdul Rashid and her daughter, Tengku Yasmin Natasha Tengku Abdul Rahman.

In an 8-1 split majority decision, a nine-person bench chaired by Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat ruled that the state assembly had no power to enact the 16 provisions, as the offences in question fell within the purview of federal law.

The following are the 16 provisions in which the Federal Court ruled as null and void:

– Section 11: Destroying or defiling place of worship
– Section 14: Sodomy
– Section 16: Sexual intercourse with a corpse
– Section 17: Sexual intercourse with non-human
– Section 31: Sexual harassment
– Section 34: Possessing false document, giving false evidence, information or statement
– Section 36: Anything intoxicating
– Section 39: Reducing scale, measurement and weight
– Section 40: Executing transactions contrary to “hukum syarak” (shariah law)
– Section 41: Executing transactions via usury
– Section 42: Abuse of halal label and connotation
– Section 43: Offering or providing vice services
– Section 44: Preparatory act of offering or providing vice services
– Section 45: Preparatory act of vice
– Section 47: Act of incest
– Section 48: Muncikari (acting as a procurer between a female and male for the purpose of prostitution)

Meanwhile, the two sections maintained by the Federal Court are:   

– Section 13: Selling or giving away a child to a non-Muslim or morally reprehensible Muslim
– Section 30: Words capable of breaking peace

In 2022, the mother and daughter filed a constitutional challenge against 20 provisions within the Kelantan Syariah Criminal Code (I) Enactment 2019.  

The duo then retracted two provisions last year, namely Section 5 (false claim) and Section 37 (gambling), which the chief justice said are considered legal.  

The 18 provisions they challenged are under the Kelantan Shariah Criminal Code (1) Enactment 2019, which lists more than 50 offences and was gazetted in December 2020. – February 9, 2024

Topics

 

Popular

Petronas staff to be shown the door to make up losses from Petros deal?

Source claims national O&G firm is expected to see 30% revenue loss once agreed formula for natural gas distribution in Sarawak is implemented

FashionValet a loss-making entity before and after Khazanah, PNB’s RM47 mil investment

GLICs bought stakes in 2018, company records show total RM103.3 million losses after tax from 2017 to 2022

[UPDATED] Petronas confirms ongoing productivity reviews to ‘eliminate inefficiencies’

Responding to Scoop, industry giant said it aims to become ‘operationally focused, commercially agile and cost-efficient’, but did not clarify if it is linked to Petros deal

Related